lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20200605140229.GI23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 15:02:29 +0100 From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] afs: Improvements for v5.8 On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 02:50:03PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 05:58:19PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > > Hi Linus, > > > > Is it too late to put in a pull request for AFS changes? Apologies - I was > > holding off and hoping that I could get Al to review the changes I made to > > the core VFS change commit (first in the series) in response to his earlier > > review comments. I have an ack for the Ext4 changes made, though. If you > > would prefer it to be held off at this point, fair enough. > > > > Note that the series also got rebased to -rc7 to remove the dependency on > > fix patches that got merged through the net tree. > > FWIW, I can live with fs/inode.c part in its current form Which is to say, ACKed-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> (fs/inode.c part) I have not checked the AFS part of the series and AFAICS ext4 one at least doesn't make things any worse there.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists