linux-ext4 - Re: [GIT PULL] afs: Improvements for v5.8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200605140229.GI23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 5 Jun 2020 15:02:29 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:     torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
        linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] afs: Improvements for v5.8

On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 02:50:03PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 05:58:19PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> > Hi Linus,
> > 
> > Is it too late to put in a pull request for AFS changes?  Apologies - I was
> > holding off and hoping that I could get Al to review the changes I made to
> > the core VFS change commit (first in the series) in response to his earlier
> > review comments.  I have an ack for the Ext4 changes made, though.  If you
> > would prefer it to be held off at this point, fair enough.
> > 
> > Note that the series also got rebased to -rc7 to remove the dependency on
> > fix patches that got merged through the net tree.
> 
> FWIW, I can live with fs/inode.c part in its current form

Which is to say,
ACKed-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> (fs/inode.c part)
I have not checked the AFS part of the series and AFAICS
ext4 one at least doesn't make things any worse there.