lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200618150309.GP8681@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date:   Thu, 18 Jun 2020 08:03:09 -0700
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
Cc:     Andreas Grünbacher 
        <andreas.gruenbacher@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@...cle.com>,
        William Kucharski <william.kucharski@...cle.com>,
        Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        cluster-devel <cluster-devel@...hat.com>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
        Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
        Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v11 16/25] fs: Convert mpage_readpages to
 mpage_readahead

On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 02:46:03PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:22 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 02:57:14AM +0200, Andreas Grünbacher wrote:
> > > Right, the approach from the following thread might fix this:
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20191122235324.17245-1-agruenba@redhat.com/T/#t
> >
> > In general, I think this is a sound approach.
> >
> > Specifically, I think FAULT_FLAG_CACHED can go away.  map_pages()
> > will bring in the pages which are in the page cache, so when we get to
> > gfs2_fault(), we know there's a reason to acquire the glock.
> 
> We'd still be grabbing a glock while holding a dependent page lock.
> Another process could be holding the glock and could try to grab the
> same page lock (i.e., a concurrent writer), leading to the same kind
> of deadlock.

What I'm saying is that gfs2_fault should just be:

+static vm_fault_t gfs2_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
+{
+	struct inode *inode = file_inode(vmf->vma->vm_file);
+	struct gfs2_inode *ip = GFS2_I(inode);
+	struct gfs2_holder gh;
+	vm_fault_t ret;
+	int err;
+
+	gfs2_holder_init(ip->i_gl, LM_ST_SHARED, 0, &gh);
+	err = gfs2_glock_nq(&gh);
+	if (err) {
+		ret = block_page_mkwrite_return(err);
+		goto out_uninit;
+	}
+	ret = filemap_fault(vmf);
+	gfs2_glock_dq(&gh);
+out_uninit:
+	gfs2_holder_uninit(&gh);
+	return ret;
+}

because by the time gfs2_fault() is called, map_pages() has already been
called and has failed to insert the necessary page, so we should just
acquire the glock now instead of trying again to look for the page in
the page cache.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists