linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 3/4] f2fs: add inline encryption support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200618192804.GA139436@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Jun 2020 12:28:04 -0700
From:   Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc:     Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>, Satya Tangirala <satyat@...gle.com>,
        linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] f2fs: add inline encryption support

On 06/18, Eric Biggers wrote:
> Hi Chao,
> 
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 06:06:02PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > @@ -936,8 +972,11 @@ void f2fs_submit_page_write(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
> > >  
> > >  	inc_page_count(sbi, WB_DATA_TYPE(bio_page));
> > >  
> > > -	if (io->bio && !io_is_mergeable(sbi, io->bio, io, fio,
> > > -			io->last_block_in_bio, fio->new_blkaddr))
> > > +	if (io->bio &&
> > > +	    (!io_is_mergeable(sbi, io->bio, io, fio, io->last_block_in_bio,
> > > +			      fio->new_blkaddr) ||
> > > +	     !f2fs_crypt_mergeable_bio(io->bio, fio->page->mapping->host,
> > > +				       fio->page->index, fio)))
> > 
> > bio_page->index, fio)))
> > 
> > >  		__submit_merged_bio(io);
> > >  alloc_new:
> > >  	if (io->bio == NULL) {
> > > @@ -949,6 +988,8 @@ void f2fs_submit_page_write(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
> > >  			goto skip;
> > >  		}
> > >  		io->bio = __bio_alloc(fio, BIO_MAX_PAGES);
> > > +		f2fs_set_bio_crypt_ctx(io->bio, fio->page->mapping->host,
> > > +				       fio->page->index, fio, GFP_NOIO);
> > 
> > bio_page->index, fio, GFP_NOIO);
> > 
> 
> We're using ->mapping->host and ->index.  Ordinarily that would mean the page
> needs to be a pagecache page.  But bio_page can also be a compressed page or a
> bounce page containing fs-layer encrypted contents.
> 
> Is your suggestion to keep using fio->page->mapping->host (since encrypted pages
> don't have a mapping), but start using bio_page->index (since f2fs apparently
> *does* set ->index for compressed pages, and if the file uses fs-layer
> encryption then f2fs_set_bio_crypt_ctx() won't use the index anyway)?
> 
> Does this mean the code is currently broken for compression + inline encryption
> because it's using the wrong ->index?  I think the answer is no, since
> f2fs_write_compressed_pages() will still pass the first 'nr_cpages' pagecache
> pages along with the compressed pages.  In that case, your suggestion would be a
> cleanup rather than a fix?
> 
> It would be helpful if there was an f2fs mount option to auto-enable compression
> on all files (similar to how test_dummy_encryption auto-enables encryption on
> all files) so that it could be tested more easily.

Eric, you can use "-o compress_extension=*".

> 
> - Eric