linux-ext4 - [PATCH v2] Valgrind reported error messages like following:

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1592533574-24249-1-git-send-email-wangshilong1991@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Jun 2020 11:26:14 +0900
From:   Wang Shilong <wangshilong1991@...il.com>
To:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     ebiggers@...nel.org, Wang Shilong <wshilong@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] Valgrind reported error messages like following:

From: Wang Shilong <wshilong@....com>

==129205==  Address 0x1b804b04 is 4 bytes after a block of size 4,096 alloc'd
==129205==    at 0x483980B: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307)
==129205==    by 0x44F973: ext2fs_get_mem (ext2fs.h:1846)
==129205==    by 0x44F973: ext2fs_get_pathname (get_pathname.c:162)
==129205==    by 0x430917: print_pathname (message.c:212)
==129205==    by 0x430FB1: expand_percent_expression (message.c:462)
==129205==    by 0x430FB1: print_e2fsck_message (message.c:544)
==129205==    by 0x430BED: expand_at_expression (message.c:262)
==129205==    by 0x430BED: print_e2fsck_message (message.c:528)
==129205==    by 0x430450: fix_problem (problem.c:2494)
==129205==    by 0x423F8B: e2fsck_process_bad_inode (pass2.c:1929)
==129205==    by 0x425AE8: check_dir_block (pass2.c:1407)
==129205==    by 0x426942: check_dir_block2 (pass2.c:961)
==129205==    by 0x445736: ext2fs_dblist_iterate3.part.0 (dblist.c:254)
==129205==    by 0x423835: e2fsck_pass2 (pass2.c:187)
==129205==    by 0x414B19: e2fsck_run (e2fsck.c:257)

Dir block might be corrupted and cause the next dirent is out
of block size boundary, even though we have the check to avoid
problem, memory check tools like valgrind still complains it.

Patch try to fix the problem by checking if offset exceed max
offset firstly before getting the pointer.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wshilong@....com>
---
v1->v2:
kept same return value for corruption case as before.
---
 lib/ext2fs/csum.c | 8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/csum.c b/lib/ext2fs/csum.c
index c2550365..417a1fba 100644
--- a/lib/ext2fs/csum.c
+++ b/lib/ext2fs/csum.c
@@ -266,16 +266,14 @@ static errcode_t __get_dirent_tail(ext2_filsys fs,
 	d = dirent;
 	top = EXT2_DIRENT_TAIL(dirent, fs->blocksize);
 
-	rec_len = translate(d->rec_len);
 	while ((void *) d < top) {
-		if ((rec_len < 8) || (rec_len & 0x03))
+		rec_len = translate(d->rec_len);
+		if ((rec_len < 8) || (rec_len & 0x03) ||
+		    (rec_len > (char *)dirent + fs->blocksize - (char *)d))
 			return EXT2_ET_DIR_CORRUPTED;
 		d = (struct ext2_dir_entry *)(((char *)d) + rec_len);
-		rec_len = translate(d->rec_len);
 	}
 
-	if ((char *)d > ((char *)dirent + fs->blocksize))
-			return EXT2_ET_DIR_CORRUPTED;
 	if (d != top)
 		return EXT2_ET_DIR_NO_SPACE_FOR_CSUM;
 
-- 
2.25.4