[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 03:44:06 -0700
From: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@...gle.com>
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] ext4: Use generic casefolding support
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 10:43 PM Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
<krisman@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@...gle.com> writes:
>
> > -
> > const struct dentry_operations ext4_dentry_ops = {
> > - .d_hash = ext4_d_hash,
> > - .d_compare = ext4_d_compare,
> > + .d_hash = generic_ci_d_hash,
> > + .d_compare = generic_ci_d_compare,
> > };
> > #endif
>
> Can you make the structure generic since it is the same for f2fs and
> ext4, which let you drop the code guards? Unless that becomes a problem for
> d_revalidate with fscrypt, it is fine like this.
>
> --
> Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
I unify them in a later patch, since I end up having to deal with
fscrypt's d_revalidate. With that patch I'd end up undoing the export
I'd add for this, so I'll skip that for the moment.
-Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists