[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200709184145.GA3855682@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 11:41:45 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Satya Tangirala <satyat@...gle.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [xfstests-bld PATCH] test-appliance: exclude generic/587 from
the encrypt tests
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 06:37:01PM +0000, Satya Tangirala wrote:
> The encryption feature doesn't play well with quota, and generic/587
> tests quota functionality.
>
> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@...gle.com>
> ---
> .../test-appliance/files/root/fs/ext4/cfg/encrypt.exclude | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/kvm-xfstests/test-appliance/files/root/fs/ext4/cfg/encrypt.exclude b/kvm-xfstests/test-appliance/files/root/fs/ext4/cfg/encrypt.exclude
> index 47c26e7..07111c2 100644
> --- a/kvm-xfstests/test-appliance/files/root/fs/ext4/cfg/encrypt.exclude
> +++ b/kvm-xfstests/test-appliance/files/root/fs/ext4/cfg/encrypt.exclude
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ generic/270
> generic/381
> generic/382
> generic/566
> +generic/587
>
> # encryption doesn't play well with casefold (at least not yet)
> generic/556
> --
Can you update encrypt_1k.exclude as well?
- Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists