lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 13 Jul 2020 19:14:47 +0530
From:   Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Ted Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        Wolfgang Frisch <wolfgang.frisch@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: catch integer overflow in ext4_cache_extents



On 7/13/20 6:28 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> From: Wolfgang Frisch <wolfgang.frisch@...e.com>
> 
> When extent tree is corrupted we can hit BUG_ON in
> ext4_es_cache_extent(). Check for this and abort caching instead of
> crashing the machine.

Was it intentionally made corrupted by crafting a corrupted disk image?
Are there more such logic in place which checks for such corruption at 
other places? Maybe a background over the issue which you saw may help.
Also how did it recover out of it?

Do you think it make sense to still emit a WARN_ON() here and then
return which warns that this could possibly a corrupted extent
entry? (maybe WARN_ON_ONCE() or via some ratelimiting if multiple extent 
entries are corrupted for that inode).

-ritesh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ