linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 2/2] iomap: fall back to buffered writes for invalidation failures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Jul 2020 13:00:55 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@...e.de>,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>,
        Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@....com>,
        Johannes Thumshirn <jth@...nel.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        cluster-devel@...hat.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iomap: fall back to buffered writes for
 invalidation failures

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 08:39:20AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> -ENOTBLK is already being used as a "magic" return code that means
> "retry this direct write as a buffered write".  Shouldn't we use that
> instead?
> 
> -EREMCHG was a private hack we put in XFS for the one case where a
> direct write had to be done through the page cache (non block-aligned
> COW), but maybe it's time we put that to rest since the rest of the
> world apparently thinks the magic fallback code is -ENOTBLK.

Sure, I can switch the error code.