[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200721103922.kpcloexbd2e6nhpm@work>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 12:39:22 +0200
From: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Ted Tso <tytso@....edu>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>,
Wolfgang Frisch <wolfgang.frisch@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ext4: Fold ext4_data_block_valid_rcu() into the
caller
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 03:18:12PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> After the previous patch, ext4_data_block_valid_rcu() has a single
> caller. Fold it into it.
Looks good, thanks!
Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> ---
> fs/ext4/block_validity.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
> index 3602356cbf09..9c40214f31f9 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
> @@ -144,40 +144,6 @@ static void debug_print_tree(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi)
> printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
> }
>
> -/*
> - * Returns 1 if the passed-in block region (start_blk,
> - * start_blk+count) is valid; 0 if some part of the block region
> - * overlaps with filesystem metadata blocks.
> - */
> -static int ext4_data_block_valid_rcu(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi,
> - struct ext4_system_blocks *system_blks,
> - ext4_fsblk_t start_blk,
> - unsigned int count, ino_t ino)
> -{
> - struct ext4_system_zone *entry;
> - struct rb_node *n;
> -
> - if ((start_blk <= le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block)) ||
> - (start_blk + count < start_blk) ||
> - (start_blk + count > ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es)))
> - return 0;
> -
> - if (system_blks == NULL)
> - return 1;
> -
> - n = system_blks->root.rb_node;
> - while (n) {
> - entry = rb_entry(n, struct ext4_system_zone, node);
> - if (start_blk + count - 1 < entry->start_blk)
> - n = n->rb_left;
> - else if (start_blk >= (entry->start_blk + entry->count))
> - n = n->rb_right;
> - else
> - return entry->ino == ino;
> - }
> - return 1;
> -}
> -
> static int ext4_protect_reserved_inode(struct super_block *sb,
> struct ext4_system_blocks *system_blks,
> u32 ino)
> @@ -333,11 +299,24 @@ void ext4_release_system_zone(struct super_block *sb)
> call_rcu(&system_blks->rcu, ext4_destroy_system_zone);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Returns 1 if the passed-in block region (start_blk,
> + * start_blk+count) is valid; 0 if some part of the block region
> + * overlaps with some other filesystem metadata blocks.
> + */
> int ext4_inode_block_valid(struct inode *inode, ext4_fsblk_t start_blk,
> unsigned int count)
> {
> + struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb);
> struct ext4_system_blocks *system_blks;
> - int ret;
> + struct ext4_system_zone *entry;
> + struct rb_node *n;
> + int ret = 1;
> +
> + if ((start_blk <= le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block)) ||
> + (start_blk + count < start_blk) ||
> + (start_blk + count > ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es)))
> + return 0;
>
> /*
> * Lock the system zone to prevent it being released concurrently
> @@ -346,8 +325,22 @@ int ext4_inode_block_valid(struct inode *inode, ext4_fsblk_t start_blk,
> */
> rcu_read_lock();
> system_blks = rcu_dereference(sbi->system_blks);
> - ret = ext4_data_block_valid_rcu(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb), system_blks,
> - start_blk, count, inode->i_ino);
> + if (system_blks == NULL)
> + goto out_rcu;
> +
> + n = system_blks->root.rb_node;
> + while (n) {
> + entry = rb_entry(n, struct ext4_system_zone, node);
> + if (start_blk + count - 1 < entry->start_blk)
> + n = n->rb_left;
> + else if (start_blk >= (entry->start_blk + entry->count))
> + n = n->rb_right;
> + else {
> + ret = (entry->ino == inode->i_ino);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +out_rcu:
> rcu_read_unlock();
> return ret;
> }
> --
> 2.16.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists