linux-ext4 - Re: RFC: iomap write invalidation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 21 Jul 2020 07:59:39 -0700
From:   "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@...e.de>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>,
        Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@....com>,
        Johannes Thumshirn <jth@...nel.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        cluster-devel@...hat.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: iomap write invalidation

On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 04:53:13PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 04:51:25PM -0500, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
> > Hi Christoph,
> > 
> > On  9:46 13/07, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > this series has two parts:  the first one picks up Dave's patch to avoid
> > > invalidation entierly for reads, picked up deep down from the btrfs iomap
> > > thread.  The second one falls back to buffered writes if invalidation fails
> > > instead of leaving a stale cache around.  Let me know what you think about
> > > this approch.
> > 
> > Which kernel version are these changes expected?
> > btrfs dio switch to iomap depends on this.
> 
> No idea.  Darrick, are you ok with picking this up soon so that
> Goldwyn can pull it in?

Yes; I was nearly about to ping you to see if you were going to have
time to push out a corrected patch 2 in time for ... 5.9?  5.10?

--D