linux-ext4 - [PATCH 2/5] fscrypt: use smp_load_acquire() for fscrypt_prepared

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200721225920.114347-3-ebiggers@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 21 Jul 2020 15:59:17 -0700
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To:     linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        Satya Tangirala <satyat@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] fscrypt: use smp_load_acquire() for fscrypt_prepared_key

From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>

Normally smp_store_release() or cmpxchg_release() is paired with
smp_load_acquire().  Sometimes smp_load_acquire() can be replaced with
the more lightweight READ_ONCE().  However, for this to be safe, all the
published memory must only be accessed in a way that involves the
pointer itself.  This may not be the case if allocating the object also
involves initializing a static or global variable, for example.

fscrypt_prepared_key includes a pointer to a crypto_skcipher object,
which is internal to and is allocated by the crypto subsystem.  By using
READ_ONCE() for it, we're relying on internal implementation details of
the crypto subsystem.

Remove this fragile assumption by using smp_load_acquire() instead.

(Note: I haven't seen any real-world problems here.  This change is just
fixing the code to be guaranteed correct and less fragile.)

Fixes: 5fee36095cda ("fscrypt: add inline encryption support")
Cc: Satya Tangirala <satyat@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
---
 fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h | 15 +++++++++------
 fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c    |  6 ++++--
 fs/crypto/keysetup.c        |  6 ++++--
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h b/fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h
index bc1a3fcd45ed..8117a61b6f55 100644
--- a/fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h
+++ b/fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h
@@ -351,13 +351,16 @@ fscrypt_is_key_prepared(struct fscrypt_prepared_key *prep_key,
 			const struct fscrypt_info *ci)
 {
 	/*
-	 * The READ_ONCE() here pairs with the smp_store_release() in
-	 * fscrypt_prepare_key().  (This only matters for the per-mode keys,
-	 * which are shared by multiple inodes.)
+	 * The two smp_load_acquire()'s here pair with the smp_store_release()'s
+	 * in fscrypt_prepare_inline_crypt_key() and fscrypt_prepare_key().
+	 * I.e., in some cases (namely, if this prep_key is a per-mode
+	 * encryption key) another task can publish blk_key or tfm concurrently,
+	 * executing a RELEASE barrier.  We need to use smp_load_acquire() here
+	 * to safely ACQUIRE the memory the other task published.
 	 */
 	if (fscrypt_using_inline_encryption(ci))
-		return READ_ONCE(prep_key->blk_key) != NULL;
-	return READ_ONCE(prep_key->tfm) != NULL;
+		return smp_load_acquire(&prep_key->blk_key) != NULL;
+	return smp_load_acquire(&prep_key->tfm) != NULL;
 }
 
 #else /* CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION_INLINE_CRYPT */
@@ -391,7 +394,7 @@ static inline bool
 fscrypt_is_key_prepared(struct fscrypt_prepared_key *prep_key,
 			const struct fscrypt_info *ci)
 {
-	return READ_ONCE(prep_key->tfm) != NULL;
+	return smp_load_acquire(&prep_key->tfm) != NULL;
 }
 #endif /* !CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION_INLINE_CRYPT */
 
diff --git a/fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c b/fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c
index d7aecadf33c1..dfb06375099a 100644
--- a/fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c
+++ b/fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c
@@ -176,8 +176,10 @@ int fscrypt_prepare_inline_crypt_key(struct fscrypt_prepared_key *prep_key,
 		}
 	}
 	/*
-	 * Pairs with READ_ONCE() in fscrypt_is_key_prepared().  (Only matters
-	 * for the per-mode keys, which are shared by multiple inodes.)
+	 * Pairs with the smp_load_acquire() in fscrypt_is_key_prepared().
+	 * I.e., here we publish ->blk_key with a RELEASE barrier so that
+	 * concurrent tasks can ACQUIRE it.  Note that this concurrency is only
+	 * possible for per-mode keys, not for per-file keys.
 	 */
 	smp_store_release(&prep_key->blk_key, blk_key);
 	return 0;
diff --git a/fs/crypto/keysetup.c b/fs/crypto/keysetup.c
index 22a94b18fe70..7f85fc645602 100644
--- a/fs/crypto/keysetup.c
+++ b/fs/crypto/keysetup.c
@@ -129,8 +129,10 @@ int fscrypt_prepare_key(struct fscrypt_prepared_key *prep_key,
 	if (IS_ERR(tfm))
 		return PTR_ERR(tfm);
 	/*
-	 * Pairs with READ_ONCE() in fscrypt_is_key_prepared().  (Only matters
-	 * for the per-mode keys, which are shared by multiple inodes.)
+	 * Pairs with the smp_load_acquire() in fscrypt_is_key_prepared().
+	 * I.e., here we publish ->tfm with a RELEASE barrier so that
+	 * concurrent tasks can ACQUIRE it.  Note that this concurrency is only
+	 * possible for per-mode keys, not for per-file keys.
 	 */
 	smp_store_release(&prep_key->tfm, tfm);
 	return 0;
-- 
2.27.0