[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <C9DAA4E8-AEA4-45A3-BF0A-E895DEA2A6C2@dilger.ca>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 16:15:10 -0600
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
To: brookxu <brookxu.cn@...il.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: optimize the implementation of ext4_mb_good_group()
On Aug 7, 2020, at 8:01 AM, brookxu <brookxu.cn@...il.com> wrote:
>
> It might be better to adjust the code in two places:
> 1. Determine whether grp is currupt or not should be placed first.
> 2. (cr<=2 && free <ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len)should may belong to the crx
> strategy, and it may be more appropriate to put it in the
> subsequent switch statement block. For cr1, cr2, the conditions
> in switch potentially realize the above judgment. For cr0, we
> should add (free <ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len) judgment, and then delete
> (free / fragments) >= ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len), because cr0 returns
> true by default.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@...cent.com>
This looks correct. Not quite as simple as moving a few lines around,
but I think the logic is equivalent.
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
> ---
> fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> index 28a139f..4304113 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> @@ -2119,13 +2119,11 @@ static bool ext4_mb_good_group(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
>
> BUG_ON(cr < 0 || cr >= 4);
This could also potentially be removed and keep only "BUG()" in the
default: case, though it would be good to print the value of "cr".
>
> - free = grp->bb_free;
> - if (free == 0)
> - return false;
> - if (cr <= 2 && free < ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len)
> + if (unlikely(EXT4_MB_GRP_BBITMAP_CORRUPT(grp)))
> return false;
>
> - if (unlikely(EXT4_MB_GRP_BBITMAP_CORRUPT(grp)))
> + free = grp->bb_free;
> + if (free == 0)
> return false;
>
> fragments = grp->bb_fragments;
> @@ -2142,8 +2140,10 @@ static bool ext4_mb_good_group(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
> ((group % flex_size) == 0))
> return false;
>
> - if ((ac->ac_2order > ac->ac_sb->s_blocksize_bits+1) ||
> - (free / fragments) >= ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len)
> + if (free < ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len)
> + return false;
> +
> + if (ac->ac_2order > ac->ac_sb->s_blocksize_bits+1)
> return true;
>
> if (grp->bb_largest_free_order < ac->ac_2order)
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
Cheers, Andreas
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (874 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists