[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200813155315.989BAA4053@d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 21:23:14 +0530
From: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
To: brookxu <brookxu.cn@...il.com>, "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
adilger.kernel@...ger.ca
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ext4: rename system_blks to s_system_blks inside
ext4_sb_info
On 8/7/20 11:50 AM, brookxu wrote:
> Rename system_blks to s_system_blks inside ext4_sb_info, keep
> the naming rules consistent with other variables, which is
> convenient for code reading and writing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@...cent.com>
Other than the points mentioned in the other email in [Patch 1/2],
(related to --thread and author signed-off-by)
this patch looks good to me. Please feel free to add,
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/block_validity.c | 14 +++++++-------
> fs/ext4/ext4.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
> index 16e9b2f..69240b4 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
> @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static void debug_print_tree(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi)
>
> printk(KERN_INFO "System zones: ");
> rcu_read_lock();
> - system_blks = rcu_dereference(sbi->system_blks);
> + system_blks = rcu_dereference(sbi->s_system_blks);
> node = rb_first(&system_blks->root);
> while (node) {
> entry = rb_entry(node, struct ext4_system_zone, node);
> @@ -263,11 +263,11 @@ int ext4_setup_system_zone(struct super_block *sb)
> int ret;
>
> if (!test_opt(sb, BLOCK_VALIDITY)) {
> - if (sbi->system_blks)
> + if (sbi->s_system_blks)
> ext4_release_system_zone(sb);
> return 0;
> }
> - if (sbi->system_blks)
> + if (sbi->s_system_blks)
> return 0;
>
> system_blks = kzalloc(sizeof(*system_blks), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ int ext4_setup_system_zone(struct super_block *sb)
> * with ext4_data_block_valid() accessing the rbtree at the same
> * time.
> */
> - rcu_assign_pointer(sbi->system_blks, system_blks);
> + rcu_assign_pointer(sbi->s_system_blks, system_blks);
>
> if (test_opt(sb, DEBUG))
> debug_print_tree(sbi);
> @@ -333,9 +333,9 @@ void ext4_release_system_zone(struct super_block *sb)
> {
> struct ext4_system_blocks *system_blks;
>
> - system_blks = rcu_dereference_protected(EXT4_SB(sb)->system_blks,
> + system_blks = rcu_dereference_protected(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_system_blks,
> lockdep_is_held(&sb->s_umount));
> - rcu_assign_pointer(EXT4_SB(sb)->system_blks, NULL);
> + rcu_assign_pointer(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_system_blks, NULL);
>
> if (system_blks)
> call_rcu(&system_blks->rcu, ext4_destroy_system_zone);
> @@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ int ext4_data_block_valid(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi, ext4_fsblk_t start_blk,
> * mount option.
> */
> rcu_read_lock();
> - system_blks = rcu_dereference(sbi->system_blks);
> + system_blks = rcu_dereference(sbi->s_system_blks);
> ret = ext4_data_block_valid_rcu(sbi, system_blks, start_blk,
> count);
> rcu_read_unlock();
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> index 8ca9adf..d60a462 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> @@ -1470,7 +1470,7 @@ struct ext4_sb_info {
> int s_jquota_fmt; /* Format of quota to use */
> #endif
> unsigned int s_want_extra_isize; /* New inodes should reserve # bytes */
> - struct ext4_system_blocks __rcu *system_blks;
> + struct ext4_system_blocks __rcu *s_system_blks;
>
> #ifdef EXTENTS_STATS
> /* ext4 extents stats */
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists