lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 17 Aug 2020 15:43:44 -0400
From:   "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To:     Rogério Brito <rbrito@....usp.br>
Cc:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Generic questions about ext4

On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 03:54:29AM +0000, Rogério Brito wrote:
> Dear developers,
> 
> I have been using ext4 for quite some time and I have some ext4
> filesystems that led me to some questions.
> 
> I have at least 2 "large" filesystems (with 2TB each, both almost
> full) dating back from 2011 and 2010. I believe that I even converted
> one of them from ext3 to ext4, but my memory is not that clear after
> almost a decade. As such, they were created without some useful
> features that are useful nowadays, like inline files. With that in
> mind, here are some questions:
> 
> 1 - I know that some features can be enabled with tune2fs, but, in
> particular, inline files don't seem to be. I've seen some people
> indicate that using debugfs, I can mark the superblock as having
> support for it. Would that really work? I don't plan on booting old
> kernels. One of those filesystems is running on an armel device that
> is quite slow and I would really like to avoid copying all the files
> to an external HD, recreating the filesystem and, then, copying back
> the files to the system.

Inline data is not enabled by default, because there are still a few
corner cases that will cause stress tests to fail.  So it's not
something I'd encourage enabling; it doesn't make that much difference
unless your workload creates huge numbers of small (< ~100 bytes)
files.  If you do create lots of small files, but then don't attempt
to append to them, or truncate them, etc., later., inline_data will
work, but it's likely that the presence or absence of inline_data
probably won't make that much difference to your application, unless
you're doing something super unusual.

> 2 - Is there any way to get transparent compression with ext4? That
> would really, really rock and is, perhaps, one of the features that
> some users like me would greatly benefit from.

No, transparent compression is not a feature ext4 has.  There has been
some thinking about creating a read-only compression feature,
primarily to speed up reading from slow devices, but full transparent
compression where users might want to seek to the middle of a
transparently compressioned file, and then writing into the middle of
said file, and making sure this is reliable even in the face of a
crash in the middle of doing such an update, etc., is something that
would be a large amount of work, for relatively little benefit, and so
I'd be surprised if that were ever to be supported in ext4.

Read-only compressed files is something that might happen at some
point, but while we have a design sketched out for it, no one is
currently actively working on that feature.

Cheers,

					- Ted

Powered by blists - more mailing lists