[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200819042438.GF162457@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 00:24:38 -0400
From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To: brookxu <brookxu.cn@...il.com>
Cc: adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, riteshh@...ux.ibm.com, jack@...e.cz,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] ext4: limit the length of per-inode prealloc list
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 03:36:15PM +0800, brookxu wrote:
> In the scenario of writing sparse files, the per-inode prealloc list may
> be very long, resulting in high overhead for ext4_mb_use_preallocated().
> To circumvent this problem, we limit the maximum length of per-inode
> prealloc list to 512 and allow users to modify it.
>
> After patching, we observed that the sys ratio of cpu has dropped, and
> the system throughput has increased significantly. We created a process
> to write the sparse file, and the running time of the process on the
> fixed kernel was significantly reduced, as follows:
>
> Running time on unfixed kernel:
> [root@...CENT64 ~]# time taskset 0x01 ./sparse /data1/sparce.dat
> real 0m2.051s
> user 0m0.008s
> sys 0m2.026s
>
> Running time on fixed kernel:
> [root@...CENT64 ~]# time taskset 0x01 ./sparse /data1/sparce.dat
> real 0m0.471s
> user 0m0.004s
> sys 0m0.395s
Thanks, applied with Ritesh's suggested spelling fix up.
- Ted
Powered by blists - more mailing lists