[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5F40E587.1080002@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 17:29:43 +0800
From: yebin <yebin10@...wei.com>
To: <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, <tytso@....edu>,
<linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Fix unnecessary hold lock when judge jinode in
ext4_inode_attach_jinode
Sorry, please ignore it.
On 2020/8/22 17:25, Ye Bin wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 3a196d81f594..3504b4cec5b8 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -4100,12 +4100,11 @@ int ext4_inode_attach_jinode(struct inode *inode)
> return 0;
>
> jinode = jbd2_alloc_inode(GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!jinode)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> if (!ei->jinode) {
> - if (!jinode) {
> - spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> - return -ENOMEM;
> - }
> ei->jinode = jinode;
> jbd2_journal_init_jbd_inode(ei->jinode, inode);
> jinode = NULL;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists