[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGqt0zxoJZrYXS+wp7bwfsajfpaotu02oUy53VkQ5CTGcE_2hA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 11:40:34 +0100
From: Yuxuan Shui <yshuiv7@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iomap: iomap_bmap should accept unwritten maps
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 11:20 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:26:14AM +0100, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Do we actually want to fix this bug or not? There are a number of
> > people actually seeing this bug.
>
> bmap should not succeed for unwritten extents.
Why not? Unwritten extents are still allocated extents.
>
> > If you think this is not the right fix, what do you think we should
> > do? If the correct fix is to make ext4 use iomap_swapfile_activate,
> > maybe we should CC the ext4 people too?
>
> Yes, ext4 should use iomap_swapfile_activate.
OK, let me CC the ext4 people.
Context:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207585
> commit ac58e4fb03f9d111d733a4ad379d06eef3a24705 moved ext4_bmap from
> generic_block_bmap to iomap_bmap, this introduced a regression which
> prevents some user from using previously working swapfiles. The kernel
> will complain about holes while there are none.
> What is happening here is that the swapfile has unwritten mappings,
> which is rejected by iomap_bmap, but was accepted by ext4_get_block.
--
Regards
Yuxuan Shui
Powered by blists - more mailing lists