lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 14:15:32 -0700 From: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com> To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext: EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS should depend on EXT4_FS instead of selecting it On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 12:37 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote: > > EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS selects EXT4_FS, thus enabling an optional feature the > user may not want to enable. Fix this by making the test depend on > EXT4_FS instead. > > Fixes: 1cbeab1b242d16fd ("ext4: add kunit test for decoding extended timestamps") > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> If I remember correctly, having EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS select EXT4_FS was something that Ted specifically requested, but I don't have any strong feelings on it either way.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists