lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:23:38 +0800
From:   yangerkun <yangerkun@...wei.com>
To:     Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>, <adilger@...ger.ca>
CC:     <tytso@....edu>, <jack@...e.com>, <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: do not use extent after put_bh



朹 2020/10/30 0:08, Ritesh Harjani 憙道:
> 
> 
> On 10/28/20 11:26 AM, yangerkun wrote:
>> ext4_ext_search_right will read more extent block and call put_bh after
>> we get the information we need. However ret_ex will break this and may
>> cause use-after-free once pagecache has been freed. Fix it by dup the
>> extent we need.
> 
> 
> It would be good if we have a test case to reproduce it. Do you?
> Ideally it should go in fstests, if you have some way to forcefully
> reproduce it/simulate it. Let me know, if needed, I can as well help to
> get those into fstests.

Sorry for that. I found this bug while reading source code. Not with a 
testcase.

And time leave for drop pagecache is so small(time between 
get_implied_cluster_alloc and ext4_ext_search_right in 
ext4_ext_map_blocks, other caller for ext4_ext_search_right won't use 
@ret_ex). It may difficult to reproduce it expect a delay injection.

Thanks,
Kun.

> 
> -ritesh
> .

Powered by blists - more mailing lists