[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201106035911.1942128-11-harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 19:58:59 -0800
From: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@...il.com>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tytso@....edu, Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@...il.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH v2 10/22] jbd2: add todo for a fast commit performance optimization
Fast commit performance can be optimized if commit thread doesn't wait
for ongoing fast commits to complete until the transaction enters
T_FLUSH state. Document this optimization.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@...il.com>
---
fs/jbd2/commit.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/jbd2/commit.c b/fs/jbd2/commit.c
index ec516490cb35..b121d7d434c6 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/commit.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/commit.c
@@ -450,6 +450,15 @@ void jbd2_journal_commit_transaction(journal_t *journal)
schedule();
write_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
finish_wait(&journal->j_fc_wait, &wait);
+ /*
+ * TODO: by blocking fast commits here, we are increasing
+ * fsync() latency slightly. Strictly speaking, we don't need
+ * to block fast commits until the transaction enters T_FLUSH
+ * state. So an optimization is possible where we block new fast
+ * commits here and wait for existing ones to complete
+ * just before we enter T_FLUSH. That way, the existing fast
+ * commits and this full commit can proceed parallely.
+ */
}
write_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
--
2.29.1.341.ge80a0c044ae-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists