linux-ext4 - [PATCH v2 13/22] ext4: dedpulicate the code to wait on inode that's being committed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu,  5 Nov 2020 19:59:02 -0800
From:   Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@...il.com>
To:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     tytso@....edu, Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@...il.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH v2 13/22] ext4: dedpulicate the code to wait on inode that's being committed

This patch removes the deduplicates the code that implements waiting
on inode that's being committed. That code is moved into a new
function.

Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@...il.com>
---
 fs/ext4/fast_commit.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c b/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
index e69c580fa91e..fc5a5e6a581d 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
@@ -155,6 +155,30 @@ void ext4_fc_init_inode(struct inode *inode)
 	ei->i_fc_committed_subtid = 0;
 }
 
+/* This function must be called with sbi->s_fc_lock held. */
+static void ext4_fc_wait_committing_inode(struct inode *inode)
+{
+	wait_queue_head_t *wq;
+	struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(inode);
+
+#if (BITS_PER_LONG < 64)
+	DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wait, &ei->i_state_flags,
+			EXT4_STATE_FC_COMMITTING);
+	wq = bit_waitqueue(&ei->i_state_flags,
+				EXT4_STATE_FC_COMMITTING);
+#else
+	DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wait, &ei->i_flags,
+			EXT4_STATE_FC_COMMITTING);
+	wq = bit_waitqueue(&ei->i_flags,
+				EXT4_STATE_FC_COMMITTING);
+#endif
+	lockdep_assert_held(&EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_fc_lock);
+	prepare_to_wait(wq, &wait.wq_entry, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+	spin_unlock(&EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_fc_lock);
+	schedule();
+	finish_wait(wq, &wait.wq_entry);
+}
+
 /*
  * Inform Ext4's fast about start of an inode update
  *
@@ -176,22 +200,7 @@ void ext4_fc_start_update(struct inode *inode)
 		goto out;
 
 	if (ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_FC_COMMITTING)) {
-		wait_queue_head_t *wq;
-#if (BITS_PER_LONG < 64)
-		DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wait, &ei->i_state_flags,
-				EXT4_STATE_FC_COMMITTING);
-		wq = bit_waitqueue(&ei->i_state_flags,
-				   EXT4_STATE_FC_COMMITTING);
-#else
-		DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wait, &ei->i_flags,
-				EXT4_STATE_FC_COMMITTING);
-		wq = bit_waitqueue(&ei->i_flags,
-				   EXT4_STATE_FC_COMMITTING);
-#endif
-		prepare_to_wait(wq, &wait.wq_entry, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-		spin_unlock(&EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_fc_lock);
-		schedule();
-		finish_wait(wq, &wait.wq_entry);
+		ext4_fc_wait_committing_inode(inode);
 		goto restart;
 	}
 out:
@@ -234,26 +243,10 @@ void ext4_fc_del(struct inode *inode)
 	}
 
 	if (ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_FC_COMMITTING)) {
-		wait_queue_head_t *wq;
-#if (BITS_PER_LONG < 64)
-		DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wait, &ei->i_state_flags,
-				EXT4_STATE_FC_COMMITTING);
-		wq = bit_waitqueue(&ei->i_state_flags,
-				   EXT4_STATE_FC_COMMITTING);
-#else
-		DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wait, &ei->i_flags,
-				EXT4_STATE_FC_COMMITTING);
-		wq = bit_waitqueue(&ei->i_flags,
-				   EXT4_STATE_FC_COMMITTING);
-#endif
-		prepare_to_wait(wq, &wait.wq_entry, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-		spin_unlock(&EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_fc_lock);
-		schedule();
-		finish_wait(wq, &wait.wq_entry);
+		ext4_fc_wait_committing_inode(inode);
 		goto restart;
 	}
-	if (!list_empty(&ei->i_fc_list))
-		list_del_init(&ei->i_fc_list);
+	list_del_init(&ei->i_fc_list);
 	spin_unlock(&EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_fc_lock);
 }
 
-- 
2.29.1.341.ge80a0c044ae-goog