lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 17 Nov 2020 18:38:30 -0800
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To:     Satya Tangirala <satyat@...gle.com>
Cc:     "Theodore Y . Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        "Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 8/8] fscrypt: update documentation for direct I/O
 support

On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 02:07:08PM +0000, Satya Tangirala wrote:
> +Direct I/O support
> +==================
> +
> +Direct I/O on encrypted files is supported through blk-crypto. In
> +particular, this means the kernel must have CONFIG_BLK_INLINE_ENCRYPTION
> +enabled, the filesystem must have had the 'inlinecrypt' mount option
> +specified, and either hardware inline encryption must be present, or
> +CONFIG_BLK_INLINE_ENCRYPTION_FALLBACK must have been enabled. Further,
> +the length of any I/O must be aligned to the filesystem block size
> +(*not* necessarily the same as the block device's block size). If any of
> +these conditions isn't met, attempts to do direct I/O on an encrypted file
> +will fall back to buffered I/O. However, there aren't any additional
> +requirements on user buffer alignment (apart from those already present
> +when using direct I/O on unencrypted files).

Actually the position in the file the I/O is targeting must be fs-block aligned
too, not just the length of the I/O.

It's only the pointer to the user data buffer that no longer needs to be
fs-block aligned (this changed between v6 and v7).

- Eric

Powered by blists - more mailing lists