[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c4c16548-1f37-a63e-de38-de5812bcc97e@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 12:25:08 +0800
From: yangerkun <yangerkun@...wei.com>
To: Mauricio Oliveira <mauricio.oliveira@...onical.com>
CC: "Theodore Y . Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
"zhangyi (F)" <yi.zhang@...wei.com>, Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>,
<zhangxiaoxu5@...wei.com>, Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>,
<hejie3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug report] journal data mode trigger panic in
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction
在 2020/11/16 21:50, Mauricio Oliveira 写道:
> Hi Kun,
>
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 5:18 AM yangerkun <yangerkun@...wei.com> wrote:
>> While using ext4 with data=journal(3.10 kernel), we meet a problem that
>> we think may never happend...
> [...]
>
> Could you please confirm you mean 5.10-rc* kernel instead of 3.10?
> (It seems so as you mention a recent commit below.) Thanks!
>
>> For now, what I have seen that can dirty buffer directly is
>> ext4_page_mkwrite(64a9f1449950 ("ext4: data=journal: fixes for
>> ext4_page_mkwrite()")), and runing ext4_punch_hole with keep_size
>> /ext4_page_mkwrite parallel can trigger above warning easily.
> [...]
>
>
Hi,
Sorry for the long delay reply... And thanks a lot for your advise! The
bug trigger with a very low probability. So won't trigger with 5.10 can
not prove no bug exist in 5.10.
Google a lot and notice that someone before has report the same bug[1].
'3b136499e906 ("ext4: fix data corruption in data=journal mode")' seems
fix the problem. I will try to understand this, and give a analysis
about how to reproduce it!
Thanks,
Kun.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists