[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <BD3A18FD-0FEA-4252-9DAC-81DA9F9F160A@dilger.ca>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 14:39:08 -0700
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Ted Tso <tytso@....edu>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] ext4: Standardize error message in
ext4_protect_reserved_inode()
On Nov 27, 2020, at 4:33 AM, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> We use __ext4_error() when ext4_protect_reserved_inode() finds
> filesystem corruption. However EXT4_ERROR_INODE_ERR() is perfectly
> capable of reporting all the needed information. So just use that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
I'm not a big fan of EXT4_ERROR_INODE_ERR() vs. ext4_error_inode_err() and
some of the error macros being upper-case vs. lower case, but that is not
the fault of this patch... :-)
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
> ---
> fs/ext4/block_validity.c | 10 ++++------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
> index 8e6ca23ed172..13ffda871227 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
> @@ -176,12 +176,10 @@ static int ext4_protect_reserved_inode(struct super_block *sb,
> err = add_system_zone(system_blks, map.m_pblk, n, ino);
> if (err < 0) {
> if (err == -EFSCORRUPTED) {
> - __ext4_error(sb, __func__, __LINE__,
> - -err, map.m_pblk,
> - "blocks %llu-%llu from inode %u overlap system zone",
> - map.m_pblk,
> - map.m_pblk + map.m_len - 1,
> - ino);
> + EXT4_ERROR_INODE_ERR(inode, -err,
> + "blocks %llu-%llu from inode overlap system zone",
> + map.m_pblk,
> + map.m_pblk + map.m_len - 1);
> }
> break;
> }
> --
> 2.16.4
>
Cheers, Andreas
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (874 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists