linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 2/2] statx: move STATX_ATTR_DAX attribute handling to filesystems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 01 Dec 2020 17:28:37 +0000
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>,
        Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-man@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        Xiaoli Feng <xifeng@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] statx: move STATX_ATTR_DAX attribute handling to filesystems

David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:

> > -	if (IS_DAX(inode))
> > -		stat->attributes |= STATX_ATTR_DAX;
> > -
> 
> This could probably be left in and not distributed amongst the filesytems
> provided that any filesystem that might turn it on sets the bit in the
> attributes_mask.

On further consideration, it's probably better to split it as you've done it.

Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>

You do need one or more Fixes: lines, though.

David