[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201201101806.3gd4kj36kpg4dif3@wittgenstein>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 11:18:06 +0100
From: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>,
Geoffrey Thomas <geofft@...reload.com>,
Mrunal Patel <mpatel@...hat.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Alban Crequy <alban@...volk.io>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>,
Stéphane Graber <stgraber@...ntu.com>,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, smbarber@...omium.org,
Phil Estes <estesp@...il.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, fstests@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
selinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/38] idmapped mounts
On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 04:54:50PM -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 10:34:49PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > Hey everyone,
>
> Hey Christian,
>
> a general request. Argue with me if it seems misguided.
>
> When looking at a patch or a small hunk of code, these days, if a variable
> called 'ns' or 'user_ns' is seen passed to a function, it can be easy to
> assume which user_ns it is based on what you think would make sense, but if
> your assumption is wrong, your patch review will be wrong.
>
> Can we stick to a convention where we have maybe
>
> subj_userns - the userns of the task seeking some action
> obj_userns - the userns of the thing being acted on - task, superblock,...
> mnt_userns - the userns of a mountpoint through which an object is seen
>
> You're replacing a lot of such callers and callsites in this patchset, so
> this would be a great time to start doing that.
Hey Serge,
this makes a lot of sense. I'll convert all accesses to the vfsmount's
userns we're introducing in this series to to mnt_userns at least.
Christian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists