lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 11:02:14 -0500 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu> To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com> Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@...il.com>, Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>, Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, "Bird, Tim" <Tim.Bird@...y.com>, "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] kunit: Support for Parameterized Testing On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 02:22:22PM -0800, 'Brendan Higgins' via KUnit Development wrote: > > Looks good to me. I would definitely like to pick this up. But yeah, > in order to pick up 2/2 we will need an ack from either Ted or Iurii. > > Ted seems to be busy right now, so I think I will just ask Shuah to go > ahead and pick this patch up by itself and we or Ted can pick up patch > 2/2 later. I have been paying attention to this patch series, but I had presumed that this was much more of a kunit change than an ext4 change, and the critical bits was a review of the kunit infrastructure. I certainly have no objection to changing the ext4 test to use the new parameterized testing, and if you'd like me to give a quick review, I'll take a quick look. I assume, Brendan, that you've already tried doing a compile and run test of the patch series, so I'm not going to do that? - Ted
Powered by blists - more mailing lists