lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 2 Dec 2020 11:02:14 -0500
From:   "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <>
To:     Brendan Higgins <>
Cc:     David Gow <>, Marco Elver <>,
        Shuah Khan <>,
        Arpitha Raghunandan <>,
        Iurii Zaikin <>,
        Andreas Dilger <>,
        "Bird, Tim" <>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        KUnit Development <>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <>,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] kunit: Support for Parameterized Testing

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 02:22:22PM -0800, 'Brendan Higgins' via KUnit Development wrote:
> Looks good to me. I would definitely like to pick this up. But yeah,
> in order to pick up 2/2 we will need an ack from either Ted or Iurii.
> Ted seems to be busy right now, so I think I will just ask Shuah to go
> ahead and pick this patch up by itself and we or Ted can pick up patch
> 2/2 later.

I have been paying attention to this patch series, but I had presumed
that this was much more of a kunit change than an ext4 change, and the
critical bits was a review of the kunit infrastructure.  I certainly
have no objection to changing the ext4 test to use the new
parameterized testing, and if you'd like me to give a quick review,
I'll take a quick look.  I assume, Brendan, that you've already tried
doing a compile and run test of the patch series, so I'm not going to
do that?

						- Ted

Powered by blists - more mailing lists