lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 2 Dec 2020 12:42:08 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Cc:     Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
        Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-man <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
        Xiaoli Feng <xifeng@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] uapi: fix statx attribute value overlap for DAX & MOUNT_ROOT

On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 6:16 PM Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com> wrote:
>
> This will force a change to xfstests at a minimum.  And I do know of users who
> have been using this value.  But I have gotten inquires about using the feature
> so there are users out there.

If it's only a few tests that fail, I wouldn't worry about it, and the
tests should just be updated.

But if there are real user concerns, we may need to have some kind of
compat code. Because of the whole "no regressions" thing.

What would the typical failure cases be in practice?

            Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ