linux-ext4 - improved performance in case of data journaling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKJOkCoUGPctXEcJWZFo+d62CSBmYjxFr1D0j74OY2ijynMyUA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Dec 2020 23:28:49 -0800
From:   lokesh jaliminche <lokesh.jaliminche@...il.com>
To:     linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: improved performance in case of data journaling

Hello everyone,

I have been doing experiments to analyze the impact of data journaling
on IO latencies. Theoretically, data journaling should show long
latencies as compared to metadata journaling. However, I observed that
when I enable data journaling I see improved performance. Is there any
specific optimization for data journaling in the write path?

fio Logs:
------------
metadata journaling enabled
========================================================================

Actual data written (calculated using iostat): 5820352 bytes

writer_2: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=(R) 4096B-4096B, (W) 4096B-4096B,
(T) 4096B-4096B, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1
fio-3.16
Starting 1 process
writer_2: Laying out IO file (1 file / 102400MiB)

writer_2: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=26021: Thu Dec  3 06:51:23 2020
  write: IOPS=24.0k, BW=97.7MiB/s (102MB/s)(2930MiB/30001msec); 0 zone resets
    clat (usec): min=12, max=3144, avg=16.63, stdev=22.33
     lat (usec): min=12, max=3144, avg=16.70, stdev=22.33
    clat percentiles (usec):
     |  1.00th=[   14],  5.00th=[   15], 10.00th=[   15], 20.00th=[   15],
     | 30.00th=[   16], 40.00th=[   16], 50.00th=[   16], 60.00th=[   16],
     | 70.00th=[   16], 80.00th=[   17], 90.00th=[   17], 95.00th=[   18],
     | 99.00th=[   34], 99.50th=[   44], 99.90th=[  424], 99.95th=[  562],
     | 99.99th=[  791]
   bw (  KiB/s): min=99856, max=100168, per=100.00%, avg=99992.14,
stdev=99.10, samples=59
   iops        : min=24964, max=25042, avg=24998.03, stdev=24.78, samples=59
  lat (usec)   : 20=96.72%, 50=2.95%, 100=0.16%, 250=0.02%, 500=0.08%
  lat (usec)   : 750=0.06%, 1000=0.01%
  lat (msec)   : 2=0.01%, 4=0.01%
  cpu          : usr=34.96%, sys=44.69%, ctx=750093, majf=0, minf=11
  IO depths    : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued rwts: total=0,750001,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
     latency   : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=1

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
  WRITE: bw=97.7MiB/s (102MB/s), 97.7MiB/s-97.7MiB/s
(102MB/s-102MB/s), io=2930MiB (3072MB), run=30001-30001msec

Disk stats (read/write):
  nvme0n1: ios=0/757110, merge=0/23753, ticks=0/12769, in_queue=116, util=99.74%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


data journaling enabled
========================================================================
Actual data written (calculated using iostat): 10070880 bytes

writer_2: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=(R) 4096B-4096B, (W) 4096B-4096B,
(T) 4096B-4096B, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1
fio-3.16
Starting 1 process
writer_2: Laying out IO file (1 file / 102400MiB)

writer_2: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=26103: Thu Dec  3 06:52:15 2020
  write: IOPS=24.0k, BW=97.7MiB/s (102MB/s)(2930MiB/30001msec); 0 zone resets
    clat (usec): min=3, max=283709, avg=15.16, stdev=946.43
     lat (usec): min=3, max=283709, avg=15.21, stdev=946.43
    clat percentiles (usec):
     |  1.00th=[    6],  5.00th=[    7], 10.00th=[    7], 20.00th=[    8],
     | 30.00th=[    8], 40.00th=[    8], 50.00th=[    9], 60.00th=[    9],
     | 70.00th=[    9], 80.00th=[   11], 90.00th=[   24], 95.00th=[   28],
     | 99.00th=[   34], 99.50th=[   44], 99.90th=[   81], 99.95th=[  676],
     | 99.99th=[  947]
   bw (  KiB/s): min=48488, max=151408, per=99.87%, avg=99861.02,
stdev=13105.09, samples=59
   iops        : min=12122, max=37852, avg=24965.25, stdev=3276.27, samples=59
  lat (usec)   : 4=0.02%, 10=79.65%, 20=5.92%, 50=14.15%, 100=0.17%
  lat (usec)   : 250=0.01%, 500=0.02%, 750=0.03%, 1000=0.03%
  lat (msec)   : 2=0.01%, 4=0.01%, 10=0.01%, 20=0.01%, 50=0.01%
  lat (msec)   : 250=0.01%, 500=0.01%
  cpu          : usr=61.73%, sys=22.41%, ctx=115437, majf=0, minf=11
  IO depths    : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued rwts: total=0,750001,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
     latency   : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=1

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
  WRITE: bw=97.7MiB/s (102MB/s), 97.7MiB/s-97.7MiB/s
(102MB/s-102MB/s), io=2930MiB (3072MB), run=30001-30001msec

Disk stats (read/write):
  nvme0n1: ios=0/766273, merge=0/766195, ticks=0/941966,
in_queue=407464, util=95.92%

Thanks & Regards,
Lokesh