lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20201204014439.GE1563847@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 17:44:39 -0800 From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com> To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>, fstests@...r.kernel.org, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] common/rc: Fix _check_s_dax() On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 07:08:39PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 11:55:50AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > *nod* and my suggestion was to explicitly test for the old/wrong value and > > offer the test-runner a hint about why it may have been set (missing the > > fix commit), but we should still ultimately fail the test when it is seen. > > Yes, that's what I'd prefer. Sorry for the misunderstanding. V3 on it's way. Ira
Powered by blists - more mailing lists