[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201204014439.GE1563847@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 17:44:39 -0800
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>, fstests@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] common/rc: Fix _check_s_dax()
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 07:08:39PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 11:55:50AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > *nod* and my suggestion was to explicitly test for the old/wrong value and
> > offer the test-runner a hint about why it may have been set (missing the
> > fix commit), but we should still ultimately fail the test when it is seen.
>
> Yes, that's what I'd prefer.
Sorry for the misunderstanding. V3 on it's way.
Ira
Powered by blists - more mailing lists