linux-ext4 - Re: UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in ext4_fill

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:28:21 -0500
From:   "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc:     syzbot <syzbot+345b75652b1d24227443@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in ext4_fill_super

On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 09:09:51AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> >  * [new tag]                   ext4-for-linus-5.8-rc1-2 -> ext4-for-linus-5.8-rc1-2
> >  ! [rejected]                  ext4_for_linus           -> ext4_for_linus  (would clobber existing tag)
> 
> Interesting. First time I see this. Should syzkaller use 'git fetch
> --tags --force"?...
> StackOverflow suggests it should help:
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58031165/how-to-get-rid-of-would-clobber-existing-tag

Yeah, sorry, ext4_for_linus is a signed tag which is only used to
authenticate my pull request to Linus.  After Linus accepts the pull,
the digital signature is going to be upstream, and so I end up
deleting and the reusing that tag for the next merge window.

I guess I could just start always using ext4_for_linus-<VERSION> and
just delete the tags once they have been accepted, to keep my list of
tags clean. 

It's going to make everyone else's tags who pull from ext4.git messy,
though, with gobs of tags that probably won't be of use to them.  It
does avoid the need to use git fetch --tags --force, and I guess
people are used to the need to GC tags with the linux-repo.  So maybe
that's the right thing to do going forward.

	     	 	       	       	   	- Ted