lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 10:13:23 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org> Subject: Re: Aarch64 EXT4FS inode checksum failures - seems to be weak memory ordering issues On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 11:27:22AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > I will note that RHEL 7 uses gcc 4.8. I personally don't have an > objections to requiring developers using RHEL 7 to have to install a > more modern gcc (since I use Debian Testing and gcc 10.2.1, myself, > and gcc 5.1 is so five years ago :-), but I could imagine that being > considered inconvenient for some. The kernel minimum (4.9) is already past that, so RHEL7 people are already out in the cold.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists