[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210109075903.208222-12-ebiggers@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 23:59:02 -0800
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 11/12] ext4: simplify i_state checks in __ext4_update_other_inode_time()
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Since I_DIRTY_TIME and I_DIRTY_INODE are mutually exclusive in i_state,
there's no need to check for I_DIRTY_TIME && !I_DIRTY_INODE. Just check
for I_DIRTY_TIME.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
---
fs/ext4/inode.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 4cc6c7834312f..00bca5c18eb65 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -4962,14 +4962,12 @@ static void __ext4_update_other_inode_time(struct super_block *sb,
return;
if ((inode->i_state & (I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE | I_NEW |
- I_DIRTY_INODE)) ||
- ((inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_TIME) == 0))
+ I_DIRTY_TIME)) != I_DIRTY_TIME)
return;
spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
- if (((inode->i_state & (I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE | I_NEW |
- I_DIRTY_INODE)) == 0) &&
- (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_TIME)) {
+ if ((inode->i_state & (I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE | I_NEW |
+ I_DIRTY_TIME)) == I_DIRTY_TIME) {
struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(inode);
inode->i_state &= ~I_DIRTY_TIME;
--
2.30.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists