[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c95ac3d6-5e9c-b706-28f7-3bbe4b75964b@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 19:45:06 +0800
From: Xiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: joseph qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: code questions about ext4_inode_datasync_dirty()
hi,
I use io_uring to evaluate ext4 randread performance(direct io), observed
obvious overhead in jbd2_transaction_committed():
Samples: 124K of event 'cycles:ppp', Event count (approx.): 80630088951
Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol
7.02% io_uring-sq-per [kernel.kallsyms] [k] jbd2_transaction_committed
The codes:
/*
* Writes that span EOF might trigger an I/O size update on completion,
* so consider them to be dirty for the purpose of O_DSYNC, even if
* there is no other metadata changes being made or are pending.
*/
iomap->flags = 0;
if (ext4_inode_datasync_dirty(inode) ||
offset + length > i_size_read(inode))
iomap->flags |= IOMAP_F_DIRTY;
ext4_inode_datasync_dirty() calls jbd2_transaction_committed(). Sorry, I don't spend
much time to learn iomap codes yet, just ask a quick question here. Do we need to call
ext4_inode_datasync_dirty() for a read operation?
If we must call ext4_inode_datasync_dirty() for a read operation, can we improve
jbd2_transaction_committed() a bit, for example, have a quick check between
inode->i_datasync_tid and j_commit_sequence, if inode->i_datasync_tid is less than
or equal to j_commit_sequence, we also don't call jbd2_transaction_committed()?
Regards,
Xiaoguang Wang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists