linux-ext4 - Re: code questions about ext4_inode_datasync

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 18 Jan 2021 20:40:47 -0700
From:   Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
To:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:     Xiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
        joseph qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: code questions about ext4_inode_datasync_dirty()

On Jan 13, 2021, at 10:19 AM, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> On Tue 12-01-21 19:45:06, Xiaoguang Wang wrote:
>> I use io_uring to evaluate ext4 randread performance(direct io), observed
>> obvious overhead in jbd2_transaction_committed():

I was going to ask about this - is the filesystem mounted with noatime or
relatime or lazytime?  Otherwise, it may be a lot of atime updates that are
causing all of this journal traffic in what _should_ be a read-only workload?

Cheers, Andreas






Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (874 bytes)