[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210119114357.w553czxsnelyph6g@wittgenstein>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 12:43:57 +0100
From: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>,
Geoffrey Thomas <geofft@...reload.com>,
Mrunal Patel <mpatel@...hat.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Alban Crequy <alban@...volk.io>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>,
St??phane Graber <stgraber@...ntu.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, smbarber@...omium.org,
Phil Estes <estesp@...il.com>, Serge Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Mauricio V??squez Bernal <mauricio@...volk.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 40/42] fs: introduce MOUNT_ATTR_IDMAP
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 09:47:50AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Generally looks good, but wouldn't it make sense to introduce the
> userns_fd in version 0 of the mount_attr structure instead of having
> two versions from the start?
I agree.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists