linux-ext4 - Re: badblocks from e2fsprogs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 1 Mar 2021 10:34:22 -0500
From:   "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To:     Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: badblocks from e2fsprogs

On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 04:12:03PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> 
> OK, I see.
> So I misunderstood the -o option.

It was clearly documented in the man page:

       -o output_file
              Write the list of bad blocks to the specified file.
              Without this option, badblocks displays the list on
              its standard output.  The format of this file is
              suitable for use by the -l option in e2fsck(8) or
              mke2fs(8).

I will say that for modern disks, the usefulness of badblocks has
decreased significantly over time.  That's because for modern-sized
disks, it can often take more than 24 hours to do a full read on the
entire disk surface --- and the factory testing done by HDD
manufacturers is far more comprehensive.

In addition, SMART (see the smartctl package) is a much more reliable
and efficient way of judging disk health.

The badblocks program was written over two decades ago, before the
days of SATA, and even IDE disks, when disk controlls and HDD's were
far more primitive.  These days, modern HDD and SSD will do their own
bad block redirection from a built-in bad block sparing pool, and the
usefulness of using badblocks has been significantly decreased.

Regards,

						- Ted