[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YGc7AcUkZ99iAOGO@mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 11:40:49 -0400
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To: Alexander Lochmann <alexander.lochmann@...dortmund.de>
Cc: Horst Schirmeier <horst.schirmeier@...dortmund.de>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Updated locking documentation for transaction_t
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 06:14:10PM +0100, Alexander Lochmann wrote:
> Some members of transaction_t are allowed to be read without
> any lock being held if accessed from the correct context.
> We used LockDoc's findings to determine those members.
> Each member of them is marked with a short comment:
> "no lock needed for jbd2 thread".
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lochmann <alexander.lochmann@...dortmund.de>
> Signed-off-by: Horst Schirmeier <horst.schirmeier@...dortmund.de>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Thanks, applied. I reflowed the comments before applying the patch.
- Ted
Powered by blists - more mailing lists