[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210406161804.20150-1-jack@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 18:17:59 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Ted Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc: <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
syzbot+30774a6acf6a2cf6d535@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: Annotate data race in start_this_handle()
Access to journal->j_running_transaction is not protected by appropriate
lock and thus is racy. We are well aware of that and the code handles
the race properly. Just add a comment and data_race() annotation.
Reported-by: syzbot+30774a6acf6a2cf6d535@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
---
fs/jbd2/transaction.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
index 9396666b7314..398d1d9209e2 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
@@ -349,7 +349,12 @@ static int start_this_handle(journal_t *journal, handle_t *handle,
}
alloc_transaction:
- if (!journal->j_running_transaction) {
+ /*
+ * This check is racy but it is just an optimization of allocating new
+ * transaction early if there are high chances we'll need it. If we
+ * guess wrong, we'll retry or free unused transaction.
+ */
+ if (!data_race(journal->j_running_transaction)) {
/*
* If __GFP_FS is not present, then we may be being called from
* inside the fs writeback layer, so we MUST NOT fail.
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists