[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210413125746.GB1366579@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 13:57:46 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, Ted Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] mm: Protect operations adding pages to page cache
with i_mapping_lock
> if (error == AOP_TRUNCATED_PAGE)
> put_page(page);
> + up_read(&mapping->host->i_mapping_sem);
> return error;
Please add an unlock_mapping label above this up_read and consolidate
most of the other unlocks by jumping there (put_and_wait_on_page_locked
probablt can't use it).
> truncated:
> unlock_page(page);
> @@ -2309,6 +2324,7 @@ static int filemap_update_page(struct kiocb *iocb,
> return AOP_TRUNCATED_PAGE;
The trunated case actually seems to miss the unlock.
Similarly I think filemap_fault would benefit from a common
unlock path.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists