lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 11:25:03 +0200 From: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net> To: Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: brendanhiggins@...gle.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, rafael@...nel.org, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, geert@...ux-m68k.org, tytso@....edu, mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com, davem@...emloft.net, broonie@...nel.org, davidgow@...gle.com, skhan@...uxfoundation.org, mptcp@...ts.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] kunit: mptcp: adhear to KUNIT formatting standard Hi Nico, On 14/04/2021 10:58, Nico Pache wrote: > Drop 'S' from end of CONFIG_MPTCP_KUNIT_TESTS inorder to adhear to the > KUNIT *_KUNIT_TEST config name format. For MPTCP, we have multiple KUnit tests: crypto and token. That's why we wrote TESTS with a S. I'm fine without S if we need to stick with KUnit' standard. But maybe the standard wants us to split the two tests and create MPTCP_TOKEN_KUNIT_TEST and MPTCP_TOKEN_KUNIT_TEST config? In this case, we could eventually keep MPTCP_KUNIT_TESTS which will in charge of selecting the two new ones. Up to the KUnit maintainers to decide ;-) Cheers, Matt -- Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions www.tessares.net
Powered by blists - more mailing lists