linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 1/2] kunit: Fix formatting of KUNIT tests to meet the standard

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YHaCtfn2UqKbhB3a@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Apr 2021 07:50:45 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, brendanhiggins@...gle.com,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        rafael@...nel.org, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
        geert@...ux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kunit: Fix formatting of KUNIT tests to meet the
 standard

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 12:33:02AM -0400, Nico Pache wrote:
> There are few instances of KUNIT tests that are not properly defined.
> This commit focuses on correcting these issues to match the standard
> defined in the Documentation.
> 
>     Issues Fixed:
>  - Tests should default to KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
>  - Tests configs tristate should have `if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS`
>  - Tests should end in KUNIT_TEST, some fixes have been applied to
>     correct issues were KUNIT_TESTS is used or KUNIT is not mentioned.
> 
> No functional changes other than CONFIG name changes
> Signed-off-by: Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>

Please put a blank line before your signed-off-by, as is required by the
tools :(

thanks,

greg k-h