linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v3] ext4: Fix occasional generic/418 failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210415195850.GA16226@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Thu, 15 Apr 2021 15:58:50 -0400
From:   Eric Whitney <enwlinux@...il.com>
To:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:     Ted Tso <tytso@....edu>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        Eric Whitney <enwlinux@...il.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ext4: Fix occasional generic/418 failure

* Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>:
> Eric has noticed that after pagecache read rework, generic/418 is
> occasionally failing for ext4 when blocksize < pagesize. In fact, the
> pagecache rework just made hard to hit race in ext4 more likely. The
> problem is that since ext4 conversion of direct IO writes to iomap
> framework (commit 378f32bab371), we update inode size after direct IO
> write only after invalidating page cache. Thus if buffered read sneaks
> at unfortunate moment like:
> 
> CPU1 - write at offset 1k                       CPU2 - read from offset 0
> iomap_dio_rw(..., IOMAP_DIO_FORCE_WAIT);
>                                                 ext4_readpage();
> ext4_handle_inode_extension()
> 
> the read will zero out tail of the page as it still sees smaller inode
> size and thus page cache becomes inconsistent with on-disk contents with
> all the consequences.
> 
> Fix the problem by moving inode size update into end_io handler which
> gets called before the page cache is invalidated.
> 
> Reported-and-tested-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@...il.com>
> Fixes: 378f32bab371 ("ext4: introduce direct I/O write using iomap infrastructure")
> CC: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> ---
>  fs/ext4/file.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/file.c b/fs/ext4/file.c
> index 194f5d00fa32..7924634ab0bf 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/file.c
> @@ -371,15 +371,32 @@ static ssize_t ext4_handle_inode_extension(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
>  static int ext4_dio_write_end_io(struct kiocb *iocb, ssize_t size,
>  				 int error, unsigned int flags)
>  {
> -	loff_t offset = iocb->ki_pos;
> +	loff_t pos = iocb->ki_pos;
>  	struct inode *inode = file_inode(iocb->ki_filp);
>  
>  	if (error)
>  		return error;
>  
> -	if (size && flags & IOMAP_DIO_UNWRITTEN)
> -		return ext4_convert_unwritten_extents(NULL, inode,
> -						      offset, size);
> +	if (size && flags & IOMAP_DIO_UNWRITTEN) {
> +		error = ext4_convert_unwritten_extents(NULL, inode, pos, size);
> +		if (error < 0)
> +			return error;
> +	}
> +	/*
> +	 * If we are extending the file, we have to update i_size here before
> +	 * page cache gets invalidated in iomap_dio_rw(). Otherwise racing
> +	 * buffered reads could zero out too much from page cache pages. Update
> +	 * of on-disk size will happen later in ext4_dio_write_iter() where
> +	 * we have enough information to also perform orphan list handling etc.
> +	 * Note that we perform all extending writes synchronously under
> +	 * i_rwsem held exclusively so i_size update is safe here in that case.
> +	 * If the write was not extending, we cannot see pos > i_size here
> +	 * because operations reducing i_size like truncate wait for all
> +	 * outstanding DIO before updating i_size.
> +	 */
> +	pos += size;
> +	if (pos > i_size_read(inode))
> +		i_size_write(inode, pos);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 


With additional data, the generic/068 failure I saw on the data=journal test
configuration when testing the v2 version of this patch doesn't appear to be
a regression.  100 runs of 068 on a v2 patched -rc7 kernel failed five times,
and it failed three times on an unpatched -rc7 kernel.  So, that failure is
most likely a latent problem unrelated to this patch.

Thanks,
Eric