[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210415055408.GA8947@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 07:54:08 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Eryu Guan <guan@...u.me>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
fstests@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, "Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -RFC] ext4: add feature file to advertise that ext4
supports idmapped mounts
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 04:47:10PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 06:41:20PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > In the ideal world, if the kernel wasn't compiled with the necessary
> > CONFIG options enabled, it's desirable of the test can detect that
> > fact and skip running the test instead failing and forcing the person
> > running the test to try to figure out whether this is a legitmate file
> > system bug or a just a test setup bug.
>
> So it would make it easier for me to manage running xfstests on ext4
> if I had added something like this to ext4 and sent it to Linus before
> v5.12 is released. What do folks think?
Completely stupid. This is a VFS-level feature and we need to have
proper VFS-level testing (which we have through creating a mount
with the option), not fs-specific band aids.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists