[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210525221351.GB202068@locust>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 15:13:51 -0700
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-cachefs@...hat.com,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
Subject: Re: How capacious and well-indexed are ext4, xfs and btrfs
directories?
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 10:26:17PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 03:13:52PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > Definitely "-o discard" is known to have a measurable performance impact,
> > simply because it ends up sending a lot more requests to the block device,
> > and those requests can be slow/block the queue, depending on underlying
> > storage behavior.
> >
> > There was a patch pushed recently that targets "-o discard" performance:
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-ext4/list/?series=244091
> > that needs a bit more work, but may be worthwhile to test if it improves
> > your workload, and help put some weight behind landing it?
>
> This all seems very complicated. I have chosen with my current laptop
> to "short stroke" the drive. That is, I discarded the entire bdev,
> then partitioned it roughly in half. The second half has never seen
> any writes. This effectively achieves the purpose of TRIM/discard;
> there are a lot of unused LBAs, so the underlying flash translation layer
> always has plenty of spare space when it needs to empty an erase block.
>
> Since the steady state of hard drives is full, I have to type 'make clean'
> in my build trees more often than otherwise and remember to delete iso
> images after i've had them lying around for a year, but I'd rather clean
> up a little more often than get these weird performance glitches.
>
> And if I really do need half a terabyte of space temporarily, I can
> always choose to use the fallow range for a while, then discard it again.
I just let xfs_scrub run FITRIM on Sundays at 4:30am. ;)
--D
Powered by blists - more mailing lists