linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 04/13] mm: Add functions to lock invalidate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM6PR04MB7081EBE7CE3404AB53F62795E7249@DM6PR04MB7081.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 May 2021 12:11:43 +0000
From:   Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com>
To:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
CC:     "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        "ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        Johannes Thumshirn <jth@...nel.org>,
        "linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
        <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
        Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>, Ted Tso <tytso@....edu>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/13] mm: Add functions to lock invalidate_lock for two
 mappings

On 2021/05/26 19:07, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 25-05-21 13:48:05, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 03:50:41PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
>>> Some operations such as reflinking blocks among files will need to lock
>>> invalidate_lock for two mappings. Add helper functions to do that.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
>>> ---
>>>  include/linux/fs.h |  6 ++++++
>>>  mm/filemap.c       | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
>>> index 897238d9f1e0..e6f7447505f5 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
>>> @@ -822,6 +822,12 @@ static inline void inode_lock_shared_nested(struct inode *inode, unsigned subcla
>>>  void lock_two_nondirectories(struct inode *, struct inode*);
>>>  void unlock_two_nondirectories(struct inode *, struct inode*);
>>>  
>>> +void filemap_invalidate_down_write_two(struct address_space *mapping1,
>>> +				       struct address_space *mapping2);
>>> +void filemap_invalidate_up_write_two(struct address_space *mapping1,
>>
>> TBH I find myself wishing that the invalidate_lock used the same
>> lock/unlock style wrappers that we use for i_rwsem.
>>
>> filemap_invalidate_lock(inode1->mapping);
>> filemap_invalidate_lock_two(inode1->i_mapping, inode2->i_mapping);
> 
> OK, and filemap_invalidate_lock_shared() for down_read()? I guess that
> works for me.

What about filemap_invalidate_lock_read() and filemap_invalidate_lock_write() ?
That reminds the down_read()/down_write() without the slightly confusing down/up.

> 
> 								Honza
> 
>  
>> To be fair, I've never been able to keep straight that down means lock
>> and up means unlock.  Ah well, at least you didn't use "p" and "v".
>>
>> Mechanically, the changes look ok to me.
>> Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org>
>>
>> --D
>>
>>> +				     struct address_space *mapping2);
>>> +
>>> +
>>>  /*
>>>   * NOTE: in a 32bit arch with a preemptable kernel and
>>>   * an UP compile the i_size_read/write must be atomic
>>> diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
>>> index 4d9ec4c6cc34..d3801a9739aa 100644
>>> --- a/mm/filemap.c
>>> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
>>> @@ -1009,6 +1009,44 @@ struct page *__page_cache_alloc(gfp_t gfp)
>>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(__page_cache_alloc);
>>>  #endif
>>>  
>>> +/*
>>> + * filemap_invalidate_down_write_two - lock invalidate_lock for two mappings
>>> + *
>>> + * Lock exclusively invalidate_lock of any passed mapping that is not NULL.
>>> + *
>>> + * @mapping1: the first mapping to lock
>>> + * @mapping2: the second mapping to lock
>>> + */
>>> +void filemap_invalidate_down_write_two(struct address_space *mapping1,
>>> +				       struct address_space *mapping2)
>>> +{
>>> +	if (mapping1 > mapping2)
>>> +		swap(mapping1, mapping2);
>>> +	if (mapping1)
>>> +		down_write(&mapping1->invalidate_lock);
>>> +	if (mapping2 && mapping1 != mapping2)
>>> +		down_write_nested(&mapping2->invalidate_lock, 1);
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(filemap_invalidate_down_write_two);
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * filemap_invalidate_up_write_two - unlock invalidate_lock for two mappings
>>> + *
>>> + * Unlock exclusive invalidate_lock of any passed mapping that is not NULL.
>>> + *
>>> + * @mapping1: the first mapping to unlock
>>> + * @mapping2: the second mapping to unlock
>>> + */
>>> +void filemap_invalidate_up_write_two(struct address_space *mapping1,
>>> +				     struct address_space *mapping2)
>>> +{
>>> +	if (mapping1)
>>> +		up_write(&mapping1->invalidate_lock);
>>> +	if (mapping2 && mapping1 != mapping2)
>>> +		up_write(&mapping2->invalidate_lock);
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(filemap_invalidate_up_write_two);
>>> +
>>>  /*
>>>   * In order to wait for pages to become available there must be
>>>   * waitqueues associated with pages. By using a hash table of
>>> -- 
>>> 2.26.2
>>>


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research