lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 16 Jun 2021 05:09:09 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>
Cc:     Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@...labora.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
        jaegeuk@...nel.org, chao@...nel.org, ebiggers@...gle.com,
        drosen@...gle.com, ebiggers@...nel.org, yuchao0@...wei.com,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/4] fs: unicode: Add utf8 module and a unicode layer

On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 08:07:07PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> I wasn't going to really oppose it from being a firmware but this
> detail, if required, makes the whole firmware idea more awkward.  If the
> whole reason to make it a firmware is to avoid the module boilerplate,
> this is just different boilerplate.  Once again, I don't know about
> precedent of kernel data as a module, and there is the problem with
> Makefile rules to install this stuff, that I mentioned.
> 
> We know we can get rid of the static call stuff already, since we likely
> won't support more encodings anyway, so that would simplify a lot the
> module specific code.

Well, another thing we can do is a data-only module.  That is a module
that just contains the tables, with the core code doing a symbol_get
on them.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists