linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 07/14] xfs: Refactor xfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 Jun 2021 17:57:12 +0200
From:   Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:     "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        Johannes Thumshirn <jth@...nel.org>,
        linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
        Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>, Ted Tso <tytso@....edu>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Pavel Reichl <preichl@...hat.com>,
        Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
        Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/14] xfs: Refactor xfs_isilocked()

On Wed 16-06-21 08:47:05, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 10:53:04AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Wed 16-06-21 06:37:12, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 11:17:57AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > From: Pavel Reichl <preichl@...hat.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Refactor xfs_isilocked() to use newly introduced __xfs_rwsem_islocked().
> > > > __xfs_rwsem_islocked() is a helper function which encapsulates checking
> > > > state of rw_semaphores hold by inode.
> > > 
> > > __xfs_rwsem_islocked doesn't seem to actually existing in any tree I
> > > checked yet?
> > 
> > __xfs_rwsem_islocked is introduced by this patch so I'm not sure what are
> > you asking about... :)
> 
> The sentence structure implies that __xfs_rwsem_islocked was previously
> introduced.  You might change the commit message to read:
> 
> "Introduce a new __xfs_rwsem_islocked predicate to encapsulate checking
> the state of a rw_semaphore, then refactor xfs_isilocked to use it."
> 
> Since it's not quite a straight copy-paste of the old code.

Ah, ok. Sure, I can rephrase the changelog (or we can just update it on
commit if that's the only problem with this series...). Oh, now I've
remembered I've promised you a branch to pull :) Here it is with this
change and Christoph's Reviewed-by tags:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs.git hole_punch_fixes

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR