lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 22 Jun 2021 19:36:26 +0100
From:   Matthew Wilcox <>
To:     Linus Torvalds <>
Cc:     David Howells <>,
        Al Viro <>, Ted Ts'o <>,
        Dave Hansen <>,
        Andrew Morton <>,
        Linux-MM <>,
        Ext4 Developers List <>,
        linux-fsdevel <>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <>
Subject: Re: Do we need to unrevert "fs: do not prefault sys_write() user
 buffer pages"?

On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 11:28:30AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 11:23 AM Matthew Wilcox <> wrote:
> >
> > It wouldn't be _that_ bad necessarily.  filemap_fault:
> It's not actually the mm code that is the biggest problem. We
> obviously already have readahead support.
> It's the *fault* side.
> In particular, since the fault would return without actually filling
> in the page table entry (because the page isn't ready yet, and you
> cannot expose it to other threads!), you also have to jump over the
> instruction that caused this all.

Oh, I was assuming that it'd be a function call like
get_user_pages_fast(), not an instruction that was specially marked to
be jumped over.  Gag reflex diminishing now?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists