[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210630155150.GC13743@locust>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:51:50 -0700
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
To: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: fstests@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] common/attr: Reduce MAX_ATTRS to leave some overhead
for 64K blocksize
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 11:58:13AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> Test generic/020 fails for ext4 with 64K blocksize. So increase some overhead
> value to reduce the MAX_ATTRS so that it can accomodate for 64K blocksize.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> common/attr | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/common/attr b/common/attr
> index d3902346..e8661d80 100644
> --- a/common/attr
> +++ b/common/attr
> @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ xfs|udf|pvfs2|9p|ceph|nfs)
> # Assume max ~1 block of attrs
> BLOCK_SIZE=`_get_block_size $TEST_DIR`
> # user.attribute_XXX="value.XXX" is about 32 bytes; leave some overhead
> - let MAX_ATTRS=$BLOCK_SIZE/40
> + let MAX_ATTRS=$BLOCK_SIZE/48
50% is quite a lot of overhead; maybe we should special-case this?
--D
> esac
>
> export MAX_ATTRS
> --
> 2.31.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists