lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20210630155150.GC13743@locust> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:51:50 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org> To: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com> Cc: fstests@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] common/attr: Reduce MAX_ATTRS to leave some overhead for 64K blocksize On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 11:58:13AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote: > Test generic/020 fails for ext4 with 64K blocksize. So increase some overhead > value to reduce the MAX_ATTRS so that it can accomodate for 64K blocksize. > > Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com> > --- > common/attr | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/common/attr b/common/attr > index d3902346..e8661d80 100644 > --- a/common/attr > +++ b/common/attr > @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ xfs|udf|pvfs2|9p|ceph|nfs) > # Assume max ~1 block of attrs > BLOCK_SIZE=`_get_block_size $TEST_DIR` > # user.attribute_XXX="value.XXX" is about 32 bytes; leave some overhead > - let MAX_ATTRS=$BLOCK_SIZE/40 > + let MAX_ATTRS=$BLOCK_SIZE/48 50% is quite a lot of overhead; maybe we should special-case this? --D > esac > > export MAX_ATTRS > -- > 2.31.1 >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists